Quantcast
Channel: Intel® VTune™ Profiler (Intel® VTune™ Amplifier)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1347

KMP_WAIT_SLEEP ; KMP_X86_PAUSE ; KMP_STATIC_YIELDS

$
0
0

Hi all,

I'm profiling a numerical model (+OpenMP) using the Intel Vtune advanced hot-spot (default) method.

The results shows that the KMP_ variables : KMP_WAIT_SLEEP ; KMP_X86_PAUSE ; KMP_STATIC_YIELDS, have a non-negligible overhead time.

In addition, another subroutine (PREDICTION) is shown to have a relatively large CPI (Pls. see the attach PNG).

My kind questions to you guys : how can/should I proceed in reducing the over-head time of these KMP_ variables?  What is more important, Over-head time or CPI - how to lower the CPI time ? Are there anymore more options that I miss based on the attached results ? 

Appreciate in advance your answers,

Jacob.

 

 

AttachmentSize
DownloadScreenshot_Project.png188.98 KB

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1347

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>